Yes, all unions need to be able to strike. It's one of the most important tools to make sure workers are not exploited. It's the cost. Cops, fire fighters, etc are part of infrastructure and they need to be able to voice when they are exploited.
Do what, better than them being homeless or having to go back to crime whi h solves zero problems.
Then striking should come back.
Nope, this is far from reality. All of FDR's plans were to prevent a socialist uprising. None of his policies devolved public property by any means. Instead his policies were to tax based on the amount of private property ( let's be clear here, large amounts of land and capital) a person or group used.
Unions gained more ground in the US post world War 2 because of the rise of manufacturing, coal and the failing of company towns.
in other words when the large cities need cops and the national guard and federal military(those are not the same in this context, they can strike and what ever happens.
look my mom is union. she retired from bells south and was made too. where is all those unionized bell south operators now?
oh wait the cell phone service eliminated those jobs. and just before that the green card carrying immigrants.
bell south and its history of buying out old private and small municipal phone grids is part of the hobby. my mom told me of a few. one being lake worth, the other i told her about okeechobee. the city i often mention had that as well but it was a small one and private and ma bell got that some time in the early 20s. they never owned phone booths until the late 60s as all of those they paid a local man who sold their lines to maintain and the land they were on. but he owned all of them from south of the cape to city limits of west palm beach.
you mean that the fact the fdr created a command economy that favored those voted for him?
you mean price controls? that he did during ww2, you couldnt have a barn on a farm, and not have power unless you physically lived in it. you had a gas and oil ration card and food card. i have family who remember that and neither are democrats today despite when that was the case my county was democrat and formed by them. both are over 80 and one is in the 90s.
im hardly fond of what you call capitalists but unions do block mistreat non union workers.? they do, the power plant here was built by both and the union workers could only use the easier escalator do build that plant and the non union guys couldnt and both had the same time limits on them to get the job done.
but that is fair?
i cant see you getting your water and power cut off and not turned on or repaired during a strike?
i have seen plenty of union reasons on what discourages actual work. i cut a tree in a parking lot that didnt take long because my work truck was touching it and being scratched. union rules would have me taking a job from the park guys, they get paid hourly no matter what. that 5 minute job and one time at that wouldnt harm them. i wasnt going to mow or trim city hall. it is no different if i go to fleet where i used to work and plug a tire and replace light bulb and wiper blades, as they know i can. it is no different if i were to help them mount a tire and torque it. i have done both when i was done and just bs ing and waiting to wash my truck and clean that beast.
plenty of meter readers i have seen leave, some fired for slacking. the current accounting director who is above our department doesnt care, she has the city manager behind her. if they think someone is that bad they fire them fast. they do have rules and i can say even in my state, the outside market is more hesistant to fire then it was even 10 years ago. i get in trouble on my part time job if i work over 6 and dont take a break and its not so with my union city job. i have not ate lunch a few time and there is no set time to do reading meters. my boss says he cant make me skip that but can punish me if do fail to finish a route. so i do finish routes and any assigned turn offs and or read and leave on and check reads first.