Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

The GOP House Circus

Donations

Total amount
$1,592.00
Goal
$5,080.00

Uncle J

Member
Is anyone following the complete debacle that is the Republican-controlled House of Representatives and their attempts to carry out even the most basic of functions (e.g., defense spending bill)? And not only is it an absolute joke, it has nothing to do with Democrats vs. Republicans....it's 100% Republican vs Republican. A sample of articles from today....

McCarthy Fails. Again.

"House Speaker Kevin McCarthy suffered yet another loss on Thursday, one that no speaker should ever experience. Five of his Republican colleagues rebelled against sending the defense appropriations bill to the floor, and blocked it. Again. These things aren’t supposed to happen in the House. Speakers don’t put a bill on the floor when they don’t have the votes locked up. A controlling bloc of the majority doesn’t vote against leadership.

Rep. Nancy Pelosi is right: As speaker, she didn’t lose any rule votes—the procedural vote that kicks off consideration of a bill—because she didn’t put them on the floor without knowing she had the votes locked up. In fact, until McCarthy, it had been more than two decades since a rule vote failed on the floor. McCarthy has managed to do it three times in four months, and twice just this week."


Kevin's Conundrum

"Last week the simmering feud between Matt Gaetz, R-Fl., and McCarthy finally boiled over when Gaetz openly threatened to take the necessary steps to remove the speaker if he didn’t agree to all of his demands. McCarthy finally lost his temper and responded, “If you want to file a motion to vacate, then file the [effin] motion.” Shortly afterwards, McCarthy had to forego plans to have the House vote on a defense spending bill because he couldn’t get the votes and Gaetz fired back,“how about just move the [effin] spending bills?” he told CNN.

So that went well. And so far this week, it’s going even better. Now the Freedom Caucus itself is at each other’s throats. On Tuesday, five hardcore MAGA Republicans stopped that proposed defense spending bill from even coming up for debate, once again paralyzing the the House making it impossible to move forward. This maneuver is very unusual and appears to be a tactic designed solely to embarrass Kevin McCarthy.

When asked about it McCarthy was clearly rattled:


Ask those five why they voted against it. Think about what they’re voting against. They’re voting against even bringing the bill up to have a discussion about it to vote on. If you’re opposed to the bill, vote against the bill at the end…You could change it if you don’t like it. But the idea that you vote against a rule, to even bring it up, that makes no sense to me,”
Mike Garcia, R-Ca., was also fit to be tied and called out his fellow Republicans. He said, “out of fear, they decided to vote against the rule to even allow this to come to the floor for debate, This city, Washington DC, is riddled with Chinese sympathizers.” You read that right. He said those five Republicans were Chinese sympathizers.

Things went downhill from there. Over the weekend, the Freedom Caucus and the leadership negotiated a stop-gap Continuing Resolution to take them through October 31st and avoid an imminent shutdown. It was a ridiculous agreement that no Democrats would sign on to but they thought they could bring together the GOP caucus to at least buy some more time. But no. When it came time to vote on Tuesday, the whole thing unraveled and 16 Republicans balked. McCarthy had to withdraw that one from the floor as well.

The recriminations were swift and nasty.
The Daily Beast reported:

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), who opposed the bill’s continued funding of the office of Trump prosecutor Jack Smith, took potshots online at one of the bill’s sponsors, Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL), who shot back, “You’ll need more than tweets and hot takes!!” Meanwhile, The Hill reported that Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-IN) blamed “weak Speaker” McCarthy, who hit back by calling Spartz a quitter for deciding to retire at the end of her term to spend more time with her family.
\
More or less sane Congressman Mike Lawlor, R-N.Y., told CNN, “this is not conservative Republicanism, this is stupidity, these people can’t define a win, they don’t know how to take yes for an answer. It’s a clown show.” That is 100% correct.

And just this afternoon...

House Speaker McCarthy Gives Up, Sends Lawmakers Packing

"After threatening to keep Republicans in town until a government spending deal was struck, a dejected House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., called it quits until further notice.

Hardline conservatives who had backed McCarthy into a corner expressed outrage that he had given up when word spread that he was sending lawmakers home. They blasted him on X, formerly known as Twitter.

"MEMBERS SHOULD NOT BE GOING HOME THIS WEEKEND!" tweeted Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo. "The government is on the verge of shutting down. I urge @SpeakerMcCarthy to keep everyone in D.C. so we can do our jobs for the American people."

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, blared on the social media site: "We should not leave town - our border is on fire & we have to get our job done.""


Like I keep saying, today's Republicans are mostly about performance, not governance. They're quite adept at shouting talking points, holding hearings, and other performance-type activities, but when it comes to the mundane task of actually running the government they are completely inept.
 
A lot of times in politics, questions like "Who's side are you on" and "Who are you fighting for" are posed to politicians. And sometimes, some politicians answer those questions without having to say a word.

Bending to far right, McCarthy pushes steep safety net cuts in shutdown battle

"Cutting housing subsidies for the poor by 33 percent as soaring rents drive a national affordability crisis. Forcing more than 1 million women and children onto the waitlist of a nutritional assistance program for poor mothers with young children. Reducing federal spending on home heating assistance for low-income families by more than 70 percent with energy prices high heading into the winter months.

With days left before the government shuts down, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) has embraced steep reductions to the U.S. safety net in an attempt to appease far-right Republicans’ demands for lower spending.
"


It's interesting to me how earlier, Republicans were yelling about how bad inflation is and how it harms American families, yet when it comes to actually helping some of those families deal with inflation, Republicans shrug their shoulders and effectively say "Meh, don't care...you're on your own".
 
A lot of times in politics, questions like "Who's side are you on"

Its funny thing is, in politics they all call each other out for each others crookedness, they do the work for me so i dont take any side as they are all equal.
 
Which is exactly what crooks want you to think. If they can convince you that everyone is crooked, they know you'll give them a free pass on whatever they do.

If a politician gets called out and admits there fault rather than lying or trying to find an excuse, that is what i repect and i can trust, but thats very rare. Its not easy for someone to admit wrong, especially in a position of government or authrority.
 
Democrats say they won’t step in to save McCarthy from effort to oust him

House Democrats will not vote to save House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (D-Calif.) from being ousted by a faction of hard-right Republicans, making it more likely that McCarthy will lose his position and thrust the House into further chaos.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday called on moderate Republicans to break away from the “extremists” in their party wing and join with Democrats “to move the Congress and the country forward.”

“We are ready, willing and able to work together with our Republican colleagues, but it is on them to join us” Jeffries told reporters after an hours-long Democratic caucus meeting.
 
US House ousts Kevin McCarthy as leader in historic vote

WASHINGTON, Oct 3 (Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives voted on Tuesday to oust Speaker Kevin McCarthy from his job, as infighting among his fellow Republicans plunged Congress into further chaos just days after it narrowly averted a government shutdown.

The 216 to 210 vote marked the first time in history that the House removed its leader, driven by a relatively small group of right-wing Republicans. No clear successor has emerged.

The rebellion was led by Representative Matt Gaetz, a far-right Republican from Florida and McCarthy antagonist who accused the party leader of not doing enough to cut federal spending.

It was the latest moment of high drama in a year that has seen the Republican-controlled House bring Washington to the brink of default and the edge of a partial government shutdown.
 
Which is exactly what crooks want you to think. If they can convince you that everyone is crooked, they know you'll give them a free pass on whatever they do.


Politics, everyone loves calling each other out to try make themselves look more righteous.

In my home country the opposition leader was in a photo smiling while eating some KFC , so apparently now hes crooked for having something to eat becaue he was hungry and obviously likes the occasional fried chcken, yet health experts are arguing he was promoting unhealthy eating. Lol.

Dang, can a politician not even eat some fried chicken in peace without being condemned for it.
 
If he was having a nice dinner with his wife and having a glass of wine smiling in a photo those same so called health experts probably have a cry hes promoting and trying to turn everyone into alcoholics.
 
Unless someone is stupid its not hard to see how low power trippers will go when they despirate for power.

The current poo party wants to stay in power yet has bad ratings, the people are not happy with there governmence over the last few years, so now if the opposition has some fried chicken the media comes out and health experts claim the oppsition leader is just so morally wrong for enjoying some fried chicken. Lol.
 
Its all good, i mean Ol man Biden enjoys a succulent icecream every now and then on camera and the media will ask him questions like what flavor he got and how it tastes, but if that was Trump with a icecream, well then the real questions get asked and he has no problem answering questions. He dont need to be protected.
 
Crictical electiion time and the unelected PM who took over the other lier eho stood downs role now has covid so is isolating for a few days has mild symptoms, even there is no mandates that he has to isolate.

But even he is a liar and a complete idiot in my opinion i always give credit where it due, and as i have always believed and said in health practice if your feeling sick then stay home and take time off, so i respect that, thats how it always should have been with covid, only sick people need stay home or see a doctor. I mean no one wants to sit in a office next to someone why they coughing or sneezing or filling a bin with snot rags all day so yea if hes got cold and flu symptoms and taking some time off as Leader of the country then thats ok.
 
If a politician cannot eat fried chicken in a photo without being accused by so called health experts of promoting unhealthy eating, then what is someone called who supports any side of a war where people are fighting and killing each other?. Are they promoting violence?.
 
Trump is a wise man. He does not promote violence as the media was trying to trap him multiple times trying get him to take a side, and he said his intentions is to stop peopoe killing each other, and he dont want to see anyone dead he dont care what nationality they are. I mean thats a morally good statement to make. He doesnt want to support people fighting he wants to try stop it, not take sides.

Yet he also knows America is always funding the BS while other countries dont pay crap. Hes not stupid.


 
Trump is a wise man. He does not promote violence

Now is the Time to Pay Attention to Trump's Violent Language

"Donald Trump has never been shy with his language but recently, the editor Alex Kingsbury argues, his violent speech has escalated. In the last few weeks alone, Trump suggested his own former general was treasonous, said that shoplifters should be shot and exhorted his followers to “go after” New York’s attorney general. Kingsbury says he understands why voters tune Trump out, but stresses the need to pay attention and take action for the sake of American democracy."

Trump’s violent rhetoric is getting muted coverage by the news media

"Last week, the Republican Party’s leading presidential candidate proposed executing suspected shoplifters.

Very simply, if you rob a store, you can fully expect to be shot as you are leaving that store,” former president Donald Trump said in Anaheim, Calif., outlining his vision for a second term at the convention of the state’s Republican Party. As the audience applauded, laughed and cheered, Trump added for emphasis, “Shot!”..

...A few days before his appearance in California, Trump suggested on his Truth Social platform that the outgoing chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark A. Milley, deserved “DEATH!” for reassuring Chinese officials that the United States had no plans to attack in the waning days of the Trump administration.

He has also hinted darkly about seeking retribution against judges, prosecutors, witnesses and officials involved in his multiple criminal and civil cases. In April, Trump said that an indictment by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg (D) would result in “potential death and destruction.” On Monday, facing a civil suit alleging business fraud, Trump urged people to “go after” Letitia James (D), the New York state attorney general who filed the suit.
"
 

Donations

Total amount
$1,592.00
Goal
$5,080.00
Back
Top