Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

  • Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
  • The Gospel of Jesus Christ

    Heard of "The Gospel"? Want to know more?

    There is salvation in no other, for there is not another name under heaven having been given among men, by which it behooves us to be saved."

Amillennialism or the truth of the Lords return

Donations

Total amount
$1,592.00
Goal
$5,080.00

Bubba

Member
Amillennialism
or the truth of the Return of the Lord Jesus
by Rev. D. H. Kuiper




In the past two articles the theories of Postmillennialism and Premillennialism have been defined and briefly discussed. In both cases it was shown that these views did not satisfy all the revealed data presented to us by the Scriptures. Each view has elements of truth to recommend it; yet at the same time each came into conflict with various portions of the Bible. although the truth concerning the parousia of Jesus Christ has been suggested previously, it is the task of this article to develop more fully that true conception, and show how the unity of the Scriptures may and must be preserved also in respect to the day of Christ's appearing. We believe this is accomplished when one holds to what has been called Amillennialism.

This terms is, perhaps, unfortunate. literally it means "no thousand years"; the amillennialist then does not believe in the millennium. The defect in the name is that the Bible DOES teach a 100 year period in SOME sense, and the term is completely negative. Since the term is with us, let us define it in such a way that it has positive content: Amillennialism is that view of the last things which denies a literal thousand year reign of Christ on this earth (Premillennialism) or a thousand year period of peace and righteousness on this earth just before Christ returns (Postmillennialism), but holds that the millennium mentioned in Rev. 20 refers to the entire period between Christ's first and last coming, from Pentecost to just before Judgment. This view is not new! It is implied in the early historic creeds of Christianity. It was held by the greatest theologians of the Church: Augustine, Luther, and Calvin. More recent theologians have also expounded this view: A. Kuyper and H. Bavinck in the Netherlands, and L. Berkhof and H. Hoeksema in this land. Also, it is the position of the Reformed Confessions, and hence of all truly Reformed believers. Revelation 20:1-10 ought to be read at this point. A brief commentary on this passage is in order.

The book of Revelation is highly symbolic and figurative and is not to be thought of as exact chronology. Thus it may not be interpreted literally in many instances, nor does it present us with twenty-two chapters of events that happened in consecutive order. Again and again the apostle John recapitulates and gives us another view of the same period of time. (Rev. 6:12-16, 16:15-19, 14:17-20 for example) Thus whatever the first ten verses of Rev. 20 may mean, it does not follow that it is all yet in the future. Rather, the apostle sees a long period of history from another point of view, that of the nations of God and Magog. And since this is a vision, and the angel, the chain, and the binding are all figurative, we may safely assume that the thousand years are also figurative. How often are numbers in this visionary book to be conceived as symbolic!

The death, resurrection, and ascension of Christ had great significance for the Church not only, but for Satan as well (see John 16:11 and Rev. 12:7-9). In our present passage the view is that Satan, who derives all his power from God (Job 1), has the power limited during the present age; this is the significance of the binding for a thousand years, verse 2. Satan, who desires to bring all possible force upon the Church of Christ to completely destroy her, is prevented from accomplishing this purpose. Oh, he is still active to a considerable extent: he goes about as a roaring lion. yet he is not able to do all he has in mind to do. He is bound (restricted) from the time of Christ's ascension until just before His glorious return. Then for a short time he is loosed to accomplish his desire: the deceiving of God and Magog, those nations which during this age have lived on the outskirts of civilization and history (verse 7-8); those vast throngs join together under the devil's direction to come against all the Christian nations in which the Church is found, but God destroys them all with fire even as He destroyed the enemies of Israel with fire (Ezek. 38).

That this is briefly the thrust of the passage may also be seen from the fourth verse. The apostle John also sees "the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus and for the Word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast neither his image (13:12), neither had received his mark upon their foreheads or in their hands (13:16,17); and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years." Clearly, this thousand years is the same period of time during which the devil is bound. It is equally clear that these beheaded individuals are saints who have already died and are in heaven, and who reign with Christ until the general resurrection of the dead. At that time all those that are Christ's join Him, in body and soul, in full heavenly perfection and glory. Those that are not His, whom he never knew, do not live now and shall not live after the resurrection; they perish everlastingly (vs.5).

In other words, during the ages of history there is a simultaneous development of two lines or seeds. From the time of Paradise, the seed of the serpent and the Seed of the woman grow and multiply: the Seed of the line of Eve is Jesus Christ and all those given unto Him by the Father, the church; the culmination and endpoint of the serpent's seed in the kingdom of Antichrist. If God and Magog refer to the numberless throngs to be found in eastern Asia, perhaps we can say that we live not only near the end of the ages, but during that time in which Satan is "loosed for a little season". At any rate, all things reach their full end and development at the same moment. The kingdom of this world, Satan's empire, culminates in the man of sin, that son of perdition, the Antichrist. Under God's longsuffering grace, the last one of His elect is born and comes to repentance so that there is a full harvest of God's children. Thus God's eternal purpose and good pleasure is reached: a Church is saved out of the midst of the world unto His eternal glory!

An interpretation as outlined above allows for a natural, consistent explanation of all Scripture passages that speak of the return of Jesus. Let us notice a few relevant points: 1. There is ONE church and ONE covenant composed of the spiritual seed of Abraham, whether they be Jew or Gentile (Gal. 3). 2. The majority of mankind is not saved, but the true Church at any given time is small and despised (Luke 12:32 and Matt, 22:14). 3. The Antichrist did not come in the past, at the destruction of Jerusalem, for example, but is yet coming (II Thess. 2:3-10). 4. The world is not being brought under Christian influence and wars are not disappearing, but wickedness increases and wars abound (Matt. 24:6,7). 5. The Church is not spirited away from the earth before the great tribulation begins, but is on the earth with the calling to endure (Matt. 24:22). 6. We must yet expect apostasy and a falling away from the faith to a staggering degree (Matt. 24:10-12 and I Tim. 4:1). 7. There shall be one resurrection of all the dead at the return of Christ in judgment (John 5:28-29). And 8. This return of Christ is very near, though no man knows the day or the hour, "The end of all things is at hand" (I Peter 4:7) and "Little children, it is the last hour" (I John 2:18).

Thus the orthodox, Reformed truth of Scripture states that Christ shall soon appear with power and glory in His resurrection body. He comes in order to raise all the dead and change the bodies of the living, to judge all men and reward them according to their works, to make a new heaven and a new earth as a fit dwelling place for Himself and His people, and thus cause all creation to partake of the liberty of the Sons of God; and finally He comes to take His redeemed Church to eternal glory and cast out the devil, his hosts, and all the wicked into everlasting fire.
 
Bubba said:
Amillennialism
or the truth of the Return of the Lord Jesus
by Rev. D. H. Kuiper

Thus the orthodox, Reformed truth of Scripture states that Christ shall soon appear with power and glory in His resurrection body. He comes in order to raise all the dead and change the bodies of the living, to judge all men and reward them according to their works, to make a new heaven and a new earth as a fit dwelling place for Himself and His people, and thus cause all creation to partake of the liberty of the Sons of God; and finally He comes to take His redeemed Church to eternal glory and cast out the devil, his hosts, and all the wicked into everlasting fire.

That's going to be quite a day!

Can you even begin to imagine what it will be like to see every grave, of every believer in Christ, throughout Earth's history openned and the dead raised that day?

What a sight that will truly be!

Praise God and His Son for the truth and promises of His Word.
 
Rev. D. H. Kuiper said:
... The book of Revelation is highly symbolic and figurative and is not to be thought of as exact chronology. Thus it may not be interpreted literally in many instances, nor does it present us with twenty-two chapters of events that happened in consecutive order. Again and again the apostle John recapitulates and gives us another view of the same period of time. (Rev. 6:12-16, 16:15-19, 14:17-20 for example) Thus whatever the first ten verses of Rev. 20 may mean, it does not follow that it is all yet in the future. Rather, the apostle sees a long period of history from another point of view, that of the nations of God and Magog. And since this is a vision, and the angel, the chain, and the binding are all figurative, we may safely assume that the thousand years are also figurative. How often are numbers in this visionary book to be conceived as symbolic! ...
While I am not Amil, I do agree with the parts I set in bold. I wish more people here could understand that this sort of "back and forth" style was characteristic of prophetic, apocalyptic writings.
 
Bubba said:
Amillennialism
or the truth of the Return of the Lord Jesus
by Rev. D. H. Kuiper

.... Amillennialism.

This view is not new! It is implied in the early historic creeds of Christianity. It was held by the greatest theologians of the Church: Augustine, Luther, and Calvin. More recent theologians have also expounded this view: A. Kuyper and H. Bavinck in the Netherlands, and L. Berkhof and H. Hoeksema in this land. Also, it is the position of the Reformed Confessions, and hence of all truly Reformed believers. Revelation 20:1-10 ought to be read at this point.


Hello Bubba,
While it is true that the reformed have leaned Post or Amil in eschatology, yet were not most of the earliest Church Fathers were some sort of historic Premil? I know Augistine was not premil, but I believe many of the others were premil. The current premil theology of Ladd is a little different then the Premill eschatology of the early Church Fathers in that Ladd denies imminence. As a matter of fact (correct me if I am wrong) I dont remember the early Church having a counsel on the issue of eschatology.


Bubba said:
The book of Revelation is highly symbolic and figurative and is not to be thought of as exact chronology. Thus it may not be interpreted literally in many instances, nor does it present us with twenty-two chapters of events that happened in consecutive order. Again and again the apostle John recapitulates and gives us another view of the same period of time. (Rev. 6:12-16, 16:15-19, 14:17-20 for example) Thus whatever the first ten verses of Rev. 20 may mean, it does not follow that it is all yet in the future. Rather, the apostle sees a long period of history from another point of view, that of the nations of God and Magog. And since this is a vision, and the angel, the chain, and the binding are all figurative, we may safely assume that the thousand years are also figurative. How often are numbers in this visionary book to be conceived as symbolic!
Both dispensationalists and Amils agree that there is obvious symbolism within the book of Revelation. Premils recognize that Revelation is apocalyptic literature and thus has many symbols in it. There is non-literal language in apocalyptic literature. However, spiritualization is not the same thing as accepting non-literal language in apocalyptic literature. I think there is still a hermaneutical issue.

Bubba said:
Material deleted interpreting Rev 20......

An interpretation as outlined above allows for a natural, consistent explanation of all Scripture passages that speak of the return of Jesus. Let us notice a few relevant points: 1. There is ONE church and ONE covenant composed of the spiritual seed of Abraham, whether they be Jew or Gentile (Gal. 3).
I would agree that Abraham is the father of those that have faith including the church and all elect, but I dont think Paul intended the comment to teach replacement theology in Galatians 3-4.


Bubba said:
2. The majority of mankind is not saved, but the true Church at any given time is small and despised (Luke 12:32 and Matt, 22:14). 3. The Antichrist did not come in the past, at the destruction of Jerusalem, for example, but is yet coming (II Thess. 2:3-10). 4. The world is not being brought under Christian influence and wars are not disappearing, but wickedness increases and wars abound (Matt. 24:6,7). 5. The Church is not spirited away from the earth before the great tribulation begins, but is on the earth with the calling to endure (Matt. 24:22). 6. We must yet expect apostasy and a falling away from the faith to a staggering degree (Matt. 24:10-12 and I Tim. 4:1).
7. There shall be one resurrection of all the dead at the return of Christ in judgment (John 5:28-29). And 8. This return of Christ is very near, though no man knows the day or the hour, "The end of all things is at hand" (I Peter 4:7) and "Little children, it is the last hour" (I John 2:18).

Thus the orthodox, Reformed truth of Scripture states that Christ shall soon appear with power and glory in His resurrection body.
Imminence is also a doctrine of dispensationalists.

Bubba said:
He comes in order to raise all the dead and change the bodies of the living, to judge all men and reward them according to their works, to make a new heaven and a new earth as a fit dwelling place for Himself and His people, and thus cause all creation to partake of the liberty of the Sons of God; and finally He comes to take His redeemed Church to eternal glory and cast out the devil, his hosts, and all the wicked into everlasting fire.

One thing that I think people assume is that premillenialism is based upon an interpretation of Rev 20. Now premil eschatology is sometimes called chiliasm, and the exact lenght of the kingdom we might take from Rev 20, but the concept of Christ coming back to set up a Jewish kingdom also comes from the Davidic Covenant and related passages in the scriptures. While Christ is on a throne in heaven at the right hand of God (acts 2), this is not the Davidic Throne. Davids throne was in Jerusalem, not heaven.
 
Mondar,
Sorry it took so long to notice your post. Do you consider yourself a Dispensationlist Premillennialism or Historic Premillennialist? My bet you are a H.P.. I really do not have much problem with the other views only Dispensationalism. The biggest issue is the interpretation of Revelation 20 and the 1000 years. I have read some stuff of George Ladd and he is solid in his theology, I would disagree only in the peripheral thoughts (like Revelation 20).
Bubba
 
Bubba, to ask what eschatological system I follow is not an easy question for me. I usually claim dispensationalism, but confused many of my reformed brothers in the Lord when I deny much of what they consider dispensationalism. I also realize that the way I express my dispensationalism at times has a reformed feel to it. Nevertheless, I think that my understanding of eschatology is very much classic dispensationalism.

Let me give you some specifics.

The Kingdom I think that we are citizens of the kingdom right now. The Church is inheriting many kingdom blessings. Yet I also believe the kingdom is future. Now I know that so far I sound much like Ladd, but I would resolve this now and later tension differently then Ladd.
----I think we are citizens of a kingdom that has not yet come, and sojourners in a foreign land. This leaves the kingdom completely unfulfilled, but yes, we are still citizens of the kingdom and have its blessings in the Church.
The New Covenant I also believe that we are under the New Covenant. We receive its blessings. Some classic dispensationalists might feel uncomfortable with me saying this. This might sound like "progressive dispensationalism" (progressive dispensationalism is very much like historical premillenialism). The problem with progressive dispensationalism is that I do not see our current New Covenant blessings as a "fulfillment" of the OT promises. When Jeremiah promised the New Covenant to "Israel" and "Judah" I take those terms literally. There is no promise of a New Covenant to the gentile/jewish Church, only to Israel. The fact that God gave the promise to the New Covenant to the Church does not mean he broke his word. God can always do more then he promised. It merely means his grace superabounds beyond his promises. In the OT God never promised not to give the New Covenant to anyone other then Israel, but he did promise to give the NC to Israel and he will fulfill his promise.
-----Let me give an analogy. Lets assume I am a multitrillionaire. If I promise my son $100 on the Day of Christmas (Day of the Lord?), and thanksgiving day comes along in November, and I give $100 to the neighbor boy, did the gift of $100 to the neighbor boy "fulfill" my promise to my son? No, of course it did not. Did it break my word to my son? No! I can still fulfill my promise. So then, I have brought the neighbor boy under my promise to my son, but have not fulfilled the promise to my son.
-----So is the Church. We have become Gods children, not through his promise, but nevertheless, by his grace. Many texts demonstrate we are under the New Covenant. (Hebrews 8-10, 1 Cor 11, 2 Cor 4) Yet not one of these texts has the word "fulfilled." My conclusion is that we are indeed under the New Covenant, but that this inclusion of gentiles and the Church into the promises of the New Covenant is not a "fulfillment" of OT promises.

In a way, Ladd's terminology is correct. The promises of God are both now and later. The difference I take from Ladd is that I see a different nature to those promises in the present time. There is no fulfillment. I think I might also see a different nature to the eventual fulfillment of the promises.

I hope this helps you to see where I am coming from. I think what I believe is a dispensational system, but I have met some people who do not think I am a dispensationalist. Sometimes I think I should forego all the usual tags in eschatology.
 
Mondar,
Thanks for your reply. There is a brief outline that explains the "Kingdom" prophecies that may help you to see the Amillennial perspective more clearly. It is:
http://members.aol.com/twarren19/amil_strimple.html
You wrote:
"-----Let me give an analogy. Lets assume I am a multitrillionaire. If I promise my son $100 on the Day of Christmas (Day of the Lord?), and thanksgiving day comes along in November, and I give $100 to the neighbor boy, did the gift of $100 to the neighbor boy "fulfill" my promise to my son? No, of course it did not. Did it break my word to my son? No! I can still fulfill my promise. So then, I have brought the neighbor boy under my promise to my son, but have not fulfilled the promise to my son.
-----So is the Church. We have become Gods children, not through his promise, but nevertheless, by his grace. Many texts demonstrate we are under the New Covenant. (Hebrews 8-10, 1 Cor 11, 2 Cor 4) Yet not one of these texts has the word "fulfilled." My conclusion is that we are indeed under the New Covenant, but that this inclusion of gentiles and the Church into the promises of the New Covenant is not a "fulfillment" of OT promises."
If true Israel is God's people, then true Israel is also in a spiritual sense the Church and also children of the promise, because we are seen as God's people through Christ as was true ethnic Israel. Many Scripture in the New Testament use words that were once directed at ethnic Israel, like 1 Peter 2:9.
Bubba
 

Donations

Total amount
$1,592.00
Goal
$5,080.00
Back
Top