There was some fraud, but not enough to change the outcome. For example, the evidence shows that Donald Trump pretty much had the "dead voter" bloc to himself. Would you like me to show you that?
Doesn't matter. It is well-documented.
Man Charged for Voting as Dead Mother for Trump in 3rd Case of Voter Fraud in Pennsylvania
"If he had voted for Joe Biden or he had written Donald Duck or Mickey Mouse, we would still be prosecuting this case," Delaware County District Attorney Jack Stollsteimer said.
www.newsweek.com
Man arrested in wife's murder now accused of voting for Trump in her name
A Colorado man arrested this month for allegedly murdering his missing wife has also been accused of voting for former President Donald Trump in her name.
abcnews.go.com
Nevada Man Is Charged With Voting Using His Dead Wife’s Ballot
Donald Kirk Hartle, a Republican, had claimed that someone voted in the 2020 election by using the mail-in ballot of his wife, who died in 2017. He now faces two counts of voter fraud.
Donald Kirk Hartle, a Republican, had claimed that someone voted in the 2020 election by using the mail-in ballot of his wife, who died in 2017. He now faces two counts of voter fraud.
www.nytimes.com
How many would you like to see?
Let's see... you want a trial to find out whether or not the republicans (who supported Trump) running the elections, cheated to let Biden win? Seriously? Georgia Republicans tried three recounts and just couldn't find a way to make it work.
Belief isn't what counts. Evidence (like the evidence I just showed you) counts. There certainly was fraud, but it wasn't close to enough to change the outcome.
Trump and his underlings launched dozens of lawsuits that were examined in court. They lost because they had no evidence. You think one more lawsuit will turn it around? Seriously?