cyberjosh
Member
I want to make this thread about one thing: practical applications. I want to go a little beyond what we usually debate here. I don't want to have a debate in here about whether you can or cannot lose your salvation other than if it is absolutely necessary to bring up a practical point.
Now I bet most people don't stop to think about this but those who believe you can't loose your salvation and those who believe you can often can agree on everything in the middle that is actually practical applications of their conclusions. My Pastor and I are like this. I tend to lean toward that you can loose your salvation but my Pastor tends to lean the other direction yet we both agree on that the believer must persevere to the end to be saved (as Jesus said) and that one is kept by God by their faith (1 Peter 1:5), thus the practical reason for faith. But whether you believe you can or can't lose your salvation - those are an impractical aspect of your conclusions; while what you do or think as a result of your conviction (on whichever stance you take) and how you apply it is practical, thus two people who disagree may have the exact same effect in how they live their life and apply their conclusions.
However there can be some differences noted and I want to explore those here, though our practical applications may have more in common than we think.
First of all because of my (impractical - as noted above) conclusion that one can lose their salvation I therefore (practically) have great concern not to offend my weaker brethren, lest they stumble and and their conscience be violated (Romans 14). We have to weigh the consequences of what this would mean if our brother in Christ was to have their conscience violated. What would happen then? I'll explore this in a minute.
....
Now let me go on a small tangent here before I make my main point. Those who love to make the "he was never saved in the first place" arguement for people who say they are saved yet seem to live in sin I must make a point that a Christian (although an abnormal experience) can live worldy and still be saved. You may say, "James 4:4 says, 'Do you not know that friendship with the world is hostility toward God?' and the believer cannot be hostile to God". Now wait a minute, does not the Word of God say in Galatians 5:17, "For the flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary to one another, so that you do not do the things that you wish.? We all know that a Christian can still slip into the flesh, and since the flesh is at enmity with the Spirit (God) then when the Christian slips into the flesh he is placing himself into a position of enmity/hostility with God (temporarily - we hope).
So let us not jump to conclusions that just because someone acts worldy that they are not saved. Because you could then (practically) misapply/misdaignose the problem thus approach reproving the person in sin with the wrong method. If you approach a backslidden believer with council of "how to get saved" you would not be helping in the least and may actually confuse the person into doubt (and perhaps scandalize a weaker brothers conscience) when you should have instead headed the words of Galatians 6:1 which speaks of restoring a brother: "Brethren, even if anyone is caught in any trespass, you who are spiritual, restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness" and adminoshing him about how his Savior (since he is saved) can help him.
Thus do not abuse "he was never saved in the first place" (although sometimes applicable) because it could cause more harm than good. I say this because a couple months ago here on the boards there were those who presumptuously called others unsaved just because they disagreed with them on an issue. While I pointed out that we should judge with righteous judgement rather than judging by external standards (John 7:24).
...
Now getting back to my point of not offending the weaker brother in the faith. Because of my belief that one can lose their salvation, if my weaker brother stumbles and harms his conscience, possibly leading him to more worldliness (keep in mind this person is saved - remember what I just said about "he was never saved to begin with) I would be concerned to want to "restore such a one" (Galatians 6:1) so that he would not walk down a path to destruction. What would the consequences of our brother stumbling me? That's for you to decide. But I say we should have concern to restore a possibly woldly or weaker brother without presuming he isn't saved because of how he lives, which might cause you to come at him with the wrong approach (misdiagnosis) - like "you need to be saved" when he actually needs to be restored in a spirit of gentleness, and built back up in Christ. I would be very careful to tell those who I love in the Church (even those who are saved) what 1 Corinthians 10:12 says, "Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed that he does not fall" while not presuming that this only applies to the unbeliever who only thinks he is saved (which it doesn't - this is a warning for beleivers as well).
So here is my question: Do any of you who believe that you cannot lose your salvation hold the same practical applications as I have presented, to where you would be genuinely concerned for those who walk the ragged edge without presuming "If they are saved they will be ok in the end" or "they were never saved to begin with"? If so I would like to know what Scriptures you use to support your view (since you are coming from the opposite perspective) to where you would actually be concerned about true believers possibly ruining their consciences or their lives by walking the "ragged edge". Where is that fine line, and do we have to call all those who walk so close to it "unsaved"?
God Bless,
~Josh
Now I bet most people don't stop to think about this but those who believe you can't loose your salvation and those who believe you can often can agree on everything in the middle that is actually practical applications of their conclusions. My Pastor and I are like this. I tend to lean toward that you can loose your salvation but my Pastor tends to lean the other direction yet we both agree on that the believer must persevere to the end to be saved (as Jesus said) and that one is kept by God by their faith (1 Peter 1:5), thus the practical reason for faith. But whether you believe you can or can't lose your salvation - those are an impractical aspect of your conclusions; while what you do or think as a result of your conviction (on whichever stance you take) and how you apply it is practical, thus two people who disagree may have the exact same effect in how they live their life and apply their conclusions.
However there can be some differences noted and I want to explore those here, though our practical applications may have more in common than we think.
First of all because of my (impractical - as noted above) conclusion that one can lose their salvation I therefore (practically) have great concern not to offend my weaker brethren, lest they stumble and and their conscience be violated (Romans 14). We have to weigh the consequences of what this would mean if our brother in Christ was to have their conscience violated. What would happen then? I'll explore this in a minute.
....
Now let me go on a small tangent here before I make my main point. Those who love to make the "he was never saved in the first place" arguement for people who say they are saved yet seem to live in sin I must make a point that a Christian (although an abnormal experience) can live worldy and still be saved. You may say, "James 4:4 says, 'Do you not know that friendship with the world is hostility toward God?' and the believer cannot be hostile to God". Now wait a minute, does not the Word of God say in Galatians 5:17, "For the flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary to one another, so that you do not do the things that you wish.? We all know that a Christian can still slip into the flesh, and since the flesh is at enmity with the Spirit (God) then when the Christian slips into the flesh he is placing himself into a position of enmity/hostility with God (temporarily - we hope).
So let us not jump to conclusions that just because someone acts worldy that they are not saved. Because you could then (practically) misapply/misdaignose the problem thus approach reproving the person in sin with the wrong method. If you approach a backslidden believer with council of "how to get saved" you would not be helping in the least and may actually confuse the person into doubt (and perhaps scandalize a weaker brothers conscience) when you should have instead headed the words of Galatians 6:1 which speaks of restoring a brother: "Brethren, even if anyone is caught in any trespass, you who are spiritual, restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness" and adminoshing him about how his Savior (since he is saved) can help him.
Thus do not abuse "he was never saved in the first place" (although sometimes applicable) because it could cause more harm than good. I say this because a couple months ago here on the boards there were those who presumptuously called others unsaved just because they disagreed with them on an issue. While I pointed out that we should judge with righteous judgement rather than judging by external standards (John 7:24).
...
Now getting back to my point of not offending the weaker brother in the faith. Because of my belief that one can lose their salvation, if my weaker brother stumbles and harms his conscience, possibly leading him to more worldliness (keep in mind this person is saved - remember what I just said about "he was never saved to begin with) I would be concerned to want to "restore such a one" (Galatians 6:1) so that he would not walk down a path to destruction. What would the consequences of our brother stumbling me? That's for you to decide. But I say we should have concern to restore a possibly woldly or weaker brother without presuming he isn't saved because of how he lives, which might cause you to come at him with the wrong approach (misdiagnosis) - like "you need to be saved" when he actually needs to be restored in a spirit of gentleness, and built back up in Christ. I would be very careful to tell those who I love in the Church (even those who are saved) what 1 Corinthians 10:12 says, "Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed that he does not fall" while not presuming that this only applies to the unbeliever who only thinks he is saved (which it doesn't - this is a warning for beleivers as well).
So here is my question: Do any of you who believe that you cannot lose your salvation hold the same practical applications as I have presented, to where you would be genuinely concerned for those who walk the ragged edge without presuming "If they are saved they will be ok in the end" or "they were never saved to begin with"? If so I would like to know what Scriptures you use to support your view (since you are coming from the opposite perspective) to where you would actually be concerned about true believers possibly ruining their consciences or their lives by walking the "ragged edge". Where is that fine line, and do we have to call all those who walk so close to it "unsaved"?
God Bless,
~Josh